Skip to main content

Toymakers brace for disruption from closing of Toys R Us stores



Toymakers brace for disruption from closing of Toys R Us stores



Toymakers brace for disruption from closing of Toys R Us stores



Toymakers big and small braced for severe disruption as bankrupt retailer Toys R Us Inc. confirmed Thursday that it plans to liquidate its U.S. business.
Toys R Us, which for decades was the nation's go-to store for toys and games, said it plans to shutter all 735 stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, including 22 in the greater Los Angeles area and 87 in California overall.
The move jeopardizes 33,000 jobs at Toys R Us, or an average of 45 employees per store, which means job losses in California could total 3,900.
The Wayne, N.J., company said it was in talks with unidentified parties for possibly combining up to 200 of its top-performing U.S. stores with its Canadian operations but would continue winding down its U.S. locations in the meantime.
Toys R Us also is pursuing a sale of the Canadian unit, along with its operations in Asia and Central Europe, and it's looking either to reorganize, liquidate or sell its chains in other nations. Toys R Us overall does business in 38 countries.
"This is a profoundly sad day for us as well as the millions of kids and families who we have served for the past 70 years," Toys R Us Chief Executive Dave Brandon, whose company has annual sales of about $11 billion, said in a statement.
It's also a blow to major toymakers Mattel Inc. and Hasbro Inc., along with smaller toy firms such as Jakks Pacific Inc. in Santa Monica, which now must scramble to find other outlets for their products.
Toys R Us' closure will "cause meaningful product-flow disruption" over the next six to nine months, analyst Stephanie Wissink of the investment firm Jefferies said in a note to clients Thursday.
Many of the toymakers' products that went to Toys R Us will now be shifted to e-commerce giant Amazon.com and to mass merchants such as Walmart Inc. and Target Corp., she said.
But it's unclear whether the toymakers will enjoy the same overall demand for their goods, partly because major retailers such as Walmart and Target don't have the same amount of shelf space devoted to toys as the Toys R Us stores.
"A typical Toys R Us carries about 3,000 more items in-store than a Walmart or Target," said Jim Silver, editor in chief of TTPM.com, a toy review site.
As a result, the stock of El Segundo-based Mattel, which already was struggling in part because of Toys R Us' bankruptcy filing last September, has plummeted 20% in the last month as speculation mounted that Toys R Us ultimately would liquidate.
Mattel's stock closed Thursday at $13.84 a share, down 34 cents, and Hasbro's stock fell 38 cents to $88.15 a share.
Mattel has pared its exposure to Toys R Us in recent years as the chain's problems mounted. The retailer accounted for 8% of Mattel's global sales in 2017, down from 11% in 2016, according to Mattel's annual securities filings.
Even so, the impact of Toys R Us' demise is one reason that speculation persists that Mattel and Pawtucket, R.I.-based Hasbro might soon merge, a prospect about which both companies have repeatedly declined to comment.
Hasbro spokeswoman Julie Duffy said Thursday that "we expect the pending liquidation and closure of Toys R Us stores to be disruptive to our business in the near term, most notably during 2018."
"But over the longer term we believe the market and Hasbro will continue to grow," Duffy said in an email. Hasbro's brands include Nerf toys, "Star Wars" and G.I. Joe figures and board games such as Monopoly.
Mattel, whose brands include the iconic Barbie doll along with Fisher-Price, Hot Wheels and American Girl dolls, did not have an immediate comment.
Jakks' products include Disney Princess toys and Nintendo action figures. Other toymakers in the Los Angeles area include MGA Entertainment Inc., maker of Bratz dolls; Bandai America Inc., maker of Power Rangers toys; Imperial Toy; and Alpha Group US.
In addition to seeking added retail outlets for their goods, the toymakers might have to implement job cuts, refinance their balance sheets and perhaps entertain merger offers, depending on how much business they've done with Toys R Us, Silver said.
"I'm sure this is a year that many larger companies are going to look to pick up some of these small and mid-sized [toy] brands at a good price," he said.
The toymakers also will try to get added distribution with retailers such as Kohl's Corp., J.C. Penney Co. and Party City Holdco Inc., which are increasingly expanding their space for toys, Silver said.
Toys R Us traces its roots to 1948 when founder Charles Lazarus opened a baby furniture store in Washington. He later began selling toys as well and adopted the Toys R Us name in 1957, with a backward "R" in the logo to give the impression a child had written it.
The company careened toward bankruptcy for several reasons, including its inability to keep pace with consumers' shift to online shopping at Amazon and other websites.
In addition, Toys R Us was saddled with $5 billion of debt stemming from its buyout in 2005 by a trio of investment firms that took the company private.
When it filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection last September, Toys R Us hoped to reorganize and continue operating. But those hopes dimmed after the chain suffered disappointing sales during the critical holiday shopping period.
================================================
Source--http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toys-r-us-toy-makers-20180315-story.html
          ================================================================


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

There Is No ‘Bitcoin’: What the SEC Doesn’t Get About Cryptocurrency

Edan Yago is the founder of  CementDAO , an effort to bring together stablecoins into a unified ecosystem.  He previously was the CEO and co-founder of software firm Epiphyte and helped set up the industry associations DATA and the Stablecoin Foundation.  The views expressed here are his own. —————————- The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been gone to significant lengths in an attempt to understand the crypto asset space. This effort is to be applauded. However, the SEC has failed to come to terms with one fundamental aspect of crypto assets and systems. Namely, properly constructed crypto systems do not involve “persons” or “entities” and do not represent a form of property. For this reason, they do not have any analogue in the traditional financial world, nor can they fall under financial regulation. In the traditional financial world, assets are a claim on a specific property. For example, a commodity, shares in a company or a debt o...

Ex-Russian Economics Minister Claims Crypto as the Right Model for Money Supply

Russia’s former Minister of Economics and Trade, Herman Gref, has spoken out in favour of cryptocurrencies and their transformational nature as a future threat to the financial sector’s status quo. Gref, who was Russian Economics minister between 2000 and 2007 is CEO and Chairman of the Executive Board of the largest Russian bank Sberbank. In a recent forum, he suggested that over time centralised money supply models would give way to new innovations. However, Gref did suggest that such change would take time and certainly wasn’t imminent, although he felt that blockchain adoption was a much nearer prospect.  Cryptocurrency adoption would, in his view, take another decade before it could offer a challenge to current banking systems , commenting that, as yet“… it’s not likely that any state is ready to part with the centralised money supply model.” Talking of DLT the ex-minister suggested that the significance of the new technology is starting to find its way into fina...

Fidelity Confirms Crypto Rumors, Recognizes Potential Of Bitcoin

Fidelity’s Crypto Platform In “Final Testing” The broader crypto industry was shocked on  mid-October , when Fidelity Investments, a Boston-based investment giant with tens of thousands of clients, and similarly impressive assets under management, revealed that it would be launching a pro-Bitcoin crypto platform. This platform, now known as Fidelity Digital Assets Services (FDAS), headed by Tom Jessop, was marketed as a way for Fidelity’s 13,000 institutional clients to gain access to top-of-the-line cryptocurrency custody and trade execution. While many were caught off guard by this announcement, Jessop explained in an  interview  with Laura Shin, a leading crypto journalist, that Fidelity’s Bitcoin ambitions started in 2014, when the company began to research and even test the flagship cryptocurrency. Rumor has it that Fidelity also set up a semi-mining farm, likely in a bid to understand blockchain technology more in-depth. And eventually, after years of exper...